The publication of this entry is delayed too: first waited publication of Millennium III , because I am plotting a reflection on the Scandinavian black literature, and publishing that ignoring the issue of La Novela More Expected (capitalization is not random) was absolutely improper and unsound; publicóse , adquiríla (June 18 itself. The first Zaragotham, make no mistake), Leila at full throttle.
escacho
Then a novel critical ventilator in an article in Oregon's Herald as petulant as inaccurate. The first is excusable, after all, the critic has referred to notable virtues and literary knowledge [although sometimes, I fear, will guide spurious reasons: in the presentation of a book: 'I came only to see the presenter, the novel does not interest me' . And it is true, the presenter in question is admired and brilliant author and commentator who has spoken here. Only the author whose first novel has been directly published by Tusquets : I guess it mosqueo Comprehending the cause of the critical criticized here, also writer of the novel is a good friend who will speak at another time].
The second, well, what of the inaccuracy, no. In fact, the less excusable is to engage in literary criticism of a genre that does not like, and probably not known or has not properly grasped, "especially when it is vehement. It's as if I am set to make criticism of jacks or so discs. Is convenient to both containment, and especially not to engage in follow what you do not know .
That crushed me comment, I turned off the drive (it a bad review made one tends to relativize the critical legitimacy, I think), so postpone the Nordic police coñazo analytical and synthesize: Millennium III, aka The Queen at the Palace of air currents (title Hake they come, btw) of Stieg Larsson is a great novel, certainly, and perhaps Manichean too happy ending, and too biased according to the author's ideological tastes, come on, that in Spain nobody would be so aware of the importance of his writing in defense of the essence of democracy (in this case escaniana) and would measure her words. In so 'careful' sometimes is ridiculous. What happens is you have a political thriller flanquillo by unknown (intestines of public Scandinavian) has me concerned. And it is cleverly written, and keeps the tension. It is at times like these, a little sluggish, but it's perfect summer novel. Ah, by the way: 864 pages of fleece.
Turning to the justification of default entradil, said he hoped to have photos of IV concert tour 'the offspring-not Modes. " But time still is not. The concert, held in THE CAVERN PRIOR last June 27, 2009 was not bad: four subjects themselves incorporate new (two mine, two of Michel) and a version indispensability, under the circumstances of Girl Yesterday quite lucid. The problem was the sound of that place that is always bad and this time was worse. It does not matter: in September we will return to desirable ARENA, and there will be better.
And, well, yesterday night I saw the film that causes this publication. Look, we bit the film, unfortunately. But yesterday I enjoyed an afternoon vagucia (incredible, for many months not 'free' in the afternoon) and finish off the play Staying within the Renoir. And we suffer TETRA. Will simplify again: go fucking pestiño. Go away. How sad that the Grand COPPOLA, whom we obrones as The Godfather, Apocalypse Now or Cotton Club (and many other 'minor works', and producer, as well as American Graffiti ) manchego copying the bloody end, becoming equally soporific designer experiences of science fiction. Curiosa the presence of VERDÚ (I've never put much, but which I saw a little desmejoradilla) and the Carmen Maura , Carmen Maura exerting , just like in any pestiño almodovarí. Vincent Gallo sought aesthetic support MBO (these with the face of bad perturbadillo tend to like).
not deny the grace of the inserts of German films of the fifties, but outside of that and any intervention that causes laughter in some high school comic (Quantification of pleasure, as two and a half minutes in total) I can only give you some friendly advice: Do not waste time or money on this gaffe of the Master. The MDC would be strict classification: bad de cojones .
0 comments:
Post a Comment