People UPFM unworthy Lest anyone get angry: this post is deliberately virulent and very little politically correct. Is what you get: I will talk about people who, perched-on-a spurious grounds, or altars that intellectual or artistic merit, dare to speak, covered with purple incomprehensible, that which we neither understand nor ever will understand, they, used to mist rather grimy. The thing goes Garzón.
Whenever I buy or read The Country (act almost daily), the most carpetovetónicos of my friends look bad, as in doubt. There is something suspicious and inappropriate in it, and so I do know: need to know the opinion of those who in principle do not think like you, since the same error you out of a , I say, and do it with conviction although I know myself that this medium has radicalized its position each time they painted rough the division of spoils, which belongs to one of the most opaque business groups in Spain, which lastly, Cebrián Academy is incomprehensible reasons, reasons similar to those that make Teddy Bautista as President of the SGAE, a place, or have someone pay the slightest attention to a clown like Ramoncín .
In the current frame of mind, with the current government (the worst in the history of Spain, remember, with the exception of the government due to Fernando VII) receiving hosts on all sides with total merit, is to that Seat Cushin half to keep the gravy train (qed) as which leads among other things to give wings to two types unworthy: José Saramago and Julián Casanova .
Saramago became a Nobel like many, it is more casual than others, I think, for example, Benavente : given the choice available to English writers I cast enough and more substance. My eyes is the author of very little interest, but that's my problem. That Esperancita (is a true story?) Will liase thinking of Lady Magician, Mrs. Sara, notable painter in an interview him pleasing to the ears of some of the antiesperancitistas (I'm one of them, but not that part). Saramago is what it is, finally, and just to have some criteria regularly read your articles in the press, and if one is fort, as the Blindness (in order ...) . What happens is that it is avowedly communist. A communist is a guy who admits that the end (a theoretical 'universal justice') justifies the means (the joint dictatorship of the proletariat, the extermination of the bourgeoisie, the use of lies, torture and violation of rights human, the lack of respect for the word, and so on., etc.). I am not aware that any community to be embarrassed to bring sickle and hammer when he peta, where that symbol is infinitely more offensive to human dignity that the swastika if we simply count the number of people killed by it. Nazi brutality becomes in terms of numbers one-hundredth of its Communist counterpart. Every time someone flies the red flag with the shit that in the upper left corner makes me want to vomit.
As Casanova , what to say. Teruel disciple of the brilliant historian (that other) Dr. Careers at the University of Zaragoza (notorious communist, too), it happened that in 2008 was chosen, a proposal from the parties (the relatives of missing persons and associations for the recovery of historical memory complainants), a member of the group of experts to search for mass graves and identification of victims in the proceedings against crimes Franco promoted by the judge ... Guess Who? Garzón. Baltasar Garzon . As is well known to my readers, I am interested in history, and especially the twentieth century and certainly in my country. Of course I have read something of the subject apart from its many well-paid articles in The Country : namely, a peculiar accounting manual dead Hidden memory , whose idea is to locate graves and give an account of the brutalities of civil war (only, of course, the rebel side, factious, fascist). Naturally, the field work he did he did his students (some of which, incidentally, is cited as co-author: those who were "politically inappropriate" and therefore questioned the merits of volume size). Besides the above, it is believed referencing handsome, smart and bright. Record. Oh, and published a stream, I think I have said, in El Pais.
Saramago bear today in El Pais (página 17), perpetrar un articulillo: Ni leyes ni justicia . Colección de lugares comunes acerca de las (hipotéticas) virtudes de Don Baltasar, llega a la colosal impertinencia de decir lo siguiente: El juez Baltasar Garzón que, víctima del despecho de algunos de sus pares, demasiado complacientes con el fascismo que perdura tras el nombre de la Falange Española y de sus acólitos, vive bajo la amenaza de una inhabilitación (...) Faltando Baltasar Garzón, suponiendo que se llegue a ese punto, será la conciencia de la parte más sana de la sociedad española la que exija la revocación de la Ley de Amnistía y que prosigan las investigaciones that will put the truth in the place was missing.
Apart from that ill-fated Azinhaga Castilian (Portugal), the pathetic Saramago forget that Spain is a rule of law, that Garzón is (by choice: has deliberately avoided rise to the level of resolution criminal jurisdiction, it remained at the instruction can still play the super-heroes. Huelebraguetas, they call in some third-crime novel) judge, and certainly technically dismal V. examine Mr. Saramago the countless romps that has been to make things BAD, BAD, BAD Tinker as a result of the utmost importance that gave out the picture with the camel coat over his shoulders to face partial constipation. This tendency to fudge has a high cost in terms of criminal convictions and economic development. A judge, Don José, is something much more serious. The law is much more serious than kicking loudmouth idiot far left as it is the guarantee of a decent life in order. Y Garzon, V. sepal is an instructor harmful. Although V. much likes to play minesweeper with tombs. Oh, by the way: the healthiest part of English society, mine (not yours: I suspect that what you would like V. is to make a bag in my house and I pegasen a shot in the neck) has no interest in making available to the Communists ancient history and, above all, to make payments for more far-left stalls. Anyway, Garzon could not initiate the proceedings in question under the law The Law Lords, not the claim of some without legal backing.
Casanova, most brazen (remember his appointment to the Commission Garzón), titled his own Jubilee Garzon to investigate crimes (page 31 of The Land of 13/02/2010). Ah, the delights of defense pesebrecillo the commissioner. No, Julian . Baltasar has played a mega-star bargain judge for incompetence, for trying to do what is not entitled to make under the current law. Not dark the last projection of Franco throws us more than thirty years after his official death , as you note. There is deficit of democratic education, as also intend. Look, see: the only truth and the truth is that if the Franco dictatorship had been so, so terrible, you had not thrived at the University strongly Franco :'d be dead with a bullet in the neck or working in an assistant oficinilla administrative. You are a communist as ever, and you were in college, and it seems that I should give many beatings or anything, right?. For now reléete, glorious Tovarich: according to you, must learn of the Second Republic, a regime ... in either case ... deserves a place of honor in the history of twentieth-century English political ... Nothing made the transition to democracy to regain its positive side, the application of its laws, reforms, hopes and dreams, getting in the same bag to the Republic, the war and dictatorship, a tragedy that suited forget. And again no, Julian. The Popular Front government was a dictatorship of the extreme left premised on the assumption that the need to exterminate the bourgeoisie. And now. With the immense stupidity of not knowing where they got (a war doomed to inevitable defeat), and the awkwardness of junipers twofold with Stalinist Russia (the sublime paradise in your eyes, of course). I can think of to justify the big ass Paca (type there ever unworthy, disgusting and brutal ruler, with little bastard comparison) but hate the attempts of those like you aim to teach young people who barely read anything a false story, biased, partial. The democratic solution to the tabula rasa of 1978 seems a possibilistic alternative. Your proposal is not at all better. I do not know what purpose except revenge well paid, have to restart the analysis of all (I hope to reach not only the animals' fascists, but also the brutality of association, the glories of Negrin, Largo Caballero and therefore worthy president of the Republic this cornucopia of honey). I do not know how you have the audacity to claim that all boils at a deficit of democratic education and, following him on the persistence in the distortion of history, having failed to implement public policies to learn memory that past. Unless, of course, that those who enganchéis the bargain under Budget State (and AC) to implement such policies ye not only communists but also people who can talk about your Czech, from your bags, in your burning of convents, of your collusion with the USSR etc., etc.
Iros to gargle, but above all not forget that your buddy, whose name clearly monarchical-magical version even has lost more than his incompetence, his arrogance, his boundless pride, seasoned with a intangibility false belief. When you do judiciaries (I mean the opposition) must know what to do, if adopted, have a job important, serious and discreet, very discreet, and not to go on TV or in the cardiorrevistas every day. If you like this, Garzon should have, I dunno, concubinage tried to run for Obregon or Big Brother or Idol, but I do not know if it gives the profile (I say for his ostensible obesity, clear .) Do not try to be a judge. Will have what they deserve in law. If not, something is wrong.
